Thursday, March 15, 2012

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA)

The ADEA is federal law regarding age discrimination in the workplace. Many states also have laws prohibiting private persons, organizations and governments from discriminating against people because of age. Under the ADEA and most State laws workers over the age of 40 are protected.


What are some of the ways an employer can discriminate in the workplace? Through job advertisements and recruitment; hiring; firing; pay; compensation; benefits both regular and fringe; apprenticeship programs; serverance packages where they require you to waive your right to sue; and possibly through age preference or age limitations in job notices or advertisements; harassment due to your age; not providing equal benefits; and retaliation after filing a claim or participating in an investigation of age discrimination.


Who investigates age discrimination claims? In Ohio, it can be the EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) or the (OCRC) Ohio Civil Rights Commission. An employee who believes they have been discriminated against must file a claim with the EEOC or OCRC within 180 days after the age discriminatroy act occurred. If you don't file within the 180 days, you lose? The investigators have one year to investigate your claims. After 90 days of investigation time you can request a "Right To Sue" letter from the EEOC, hire a private attorney and pursue your age discrimination case in a Court of Common Pleas in the county where the discrimination occurred.


Under Ohio law, a case of age discrimination may be proved either directly or indirectly. An employee "may establish a case of age discrimination directly by presenting evidence, of any nature, to show that an employer more likely than not was motivated by discriminatory intent. If, however, the employee is unable to establish a causal link or nexus between the employer's discriminatory statements or conduct and the act that allegedly violated the employee's rights under the statute, then the employee has not proved age discrimination by the direct method of proof. Without direct proof of discrimination, an employee may establish a claim of age discrimination indirectly by demonstrating he or she (1) was a member of the statutorily protected class, (2) was discharged, (3) was qualified for the position, and (4) was replaced by, or the discharge permitted the retention of, a person of substantially younger age.  If a plaintiff establishes a case of age discrimination, the burden shifts to the employer to provide some legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the action taken. If the employer establishes a nondiscriminatory reason, the employee then bears the burden of showing the employer's proffered reason was a pretext for impermissible discrimination. The employee must demonstrate the employer's nondiscriminatory reason was pretextual (a false or weak reason or motive said to hide the actual reason or motive). While age-related comments directed toward the employee may support an inference of age discrimination, isolated, ambiguous, or abstract comments cannot support a finding of age discrimination.


Hostile work environment under the ADEA. The criteria for a claim of hostile work environment under the ADEA is  the emplyee has to be 40 years of age or older; the employee was subjected to harassment either through words or actions based on age; the harassment had the effect of unreasonably interfering with the employee's work performance and creating an objectively intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment and there exists some basis for liability on the part of the employer. We must keep in mind that a discriminatorily abusive work environment, even one that does not seriously affect employees’ psychological well-being, can and often will detract from employees’ job performance, discourage employees from remaining on the job, or keep them from advancing in their careers. Further, whether harassment is sufficiently severe or pervasive to create an abusive work environment is quintessentially a question of fact. A court must consider all of the relevant circumstances in order to determine whether an environment is hostile or abusive. These circumstances “may include the frequency of the discriminatory conduct; its severity; whether it is physically threatening or humiliating, or a merely offensive utterance; and whether it unreasonably interferes with an employee’s work performance. The effect on the employee’s psychological well-being is, of course, relevant to determining whether the plaintiff actually found the environment abusive. But while psychological harm, like any other relevant factor, may be taken into account, no single factor is required.


If I win what damages can I get?  Compensatory damages such as: back pay for any income you have loss, attorney fees, emotional distress, force employer to re-hire you, lost future wages. Punitive damages which serve to punish an employer for their bad behavior.


Always talk to an attorney before filing a claim with EEOC or OCRC. Always talk to an attorney before you sign a waiver of your rights to sue or a severance package.

No comments:

Post a Comment